Re: New Firefox bug (and fix)

From: Imhotep (Imhotep_at_nospam.net)
Date: 09/15/05 

Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:30:52 -0400

Hairy One Kenobi wrote:

> "Imhotep" <Imhotep@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:09CdnVfYqruR3LXeRVn-ug@adelphia.com...
>> Hairy One Kenobi wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> > Chance would be a fine thing.. <_< Best bet is, before you post next to
>> > reread what you've written. Then remove any bigotry, and only /then/
>> > post.. saves all of this spinning.
>>
>> Bigotry? Do you even know what he hell the word means? Please illustate
>> where I have said a bigoted statement! Do not waste my time with foolish
> BS
>> either as I am rapidly loosing my patients with your dribble.
>
> No drool on *my* keyboard.. did you mean "drivel", perchance?

Nope drool...
 
> bigot, n, a person who is predudiced in their views and intolerant of the
> opinions of others (Source - Concise OED)
>
> bigotry, n, demonstrating that fact... ;o)
>
> I'll just stick to the first page in Google for this very froup (for
> brevity)
>
> "Again, this was what java was all about. However, M$ did successfully
> sabotage it on Windows just for that reason."
>
> (Again concerning Java) "Kinda funny that is runs well in Linux, BSDs and
> Macs but, only Windows has a problem with it....hummmmm... "
>
> "Did you even read the paragraph??? The point was that MS intentional
> sabotaged Java because it threaten their marketing strategy... "
>
> "People have only been saying that Linux will be on the desktop for about
> three years (not talking about those lame "computer" magizines that are
> nothing more and a couple of "articles" and 9000 adds."
>
> "Even Gartner is saying that within 5 years Linux will be common place on
> the desktop."
>
> "In fact Linux growth is only slow in the US. "
>
> "Open Source has just recently become a big item."
>
> "I know MS, the last thing they want is software that IS NOT dependant on
> Windows. That IS a fact. This is how they make suckers of sooo many. " (I
> guess we skipped that whole DOS & XENIX thang, then? Mind you, OS/2
> <shudder>)
>
> [The BBC] "listened, rather than trying to push new laws or hardware (Like
> Microsoft and their partners)...."
>
> "Ah yes, the old use proprietary hardware and pass the cost to the your
> users...Personally, I'm not interested. " (only mentioned this one to see
> if you'll retort with "Intel isn't proprietory" ;o)
>
> "The registry was intentionally made overly complex as to force companies
> to become a "Microsoft partner"."
>
> "Ditching Microsoft would be a good start! If Linux/BSD is not your thing
> check out the Macs."
>
> "VMS was a stable reliable OS and, well, windows is just not and never has
> been.... " (not that I necessarily disagree too strongly with this one - I
> invariably find some excuse to reboot every few months. Although I
> genuinely can't remember why I rebooted the web server last July..?)
>
> "So, I challenge anyone to come up with a reasonable explanation on what
> you think Microsoft's motives are (if you do not believe me when I say
> they are benefiting from spammers)"
>
> (On the subject of spam) "Banning Windows is a thought."
>
> "Occasionally, I hear that out-of-touch argument about "not enough
> applications on linux/BSD/UNIX"..."
>
> "Just makes sense, as proprietary software is a trap"
>
> "When trying to understand Microsoft often one must look in the shadows
> for the truth"

Yup!

> I've skipped the "intolerant" part - just look at any post where both you
> and Jim have posted <whistling>..

<yawning> whatever.

> By now, I've had /quite/ enough of reading this crap, as I'm sure everyone
> else has. At least they didn't have to wade through it twice.

I was just thinking the same about you. You waste my time yet again....

> Feel free to post random news quotes - I can filter that mentally, rather
> than resort to the killfile. And a killfile is, by definition, against the
> very principle of Usenet. (This isn't some sort of ***-eyed threat,
> merely a comment, BTW)

Do you think, even for a second, that I care what you do? Even for a second?

> *Please* just follow the suggestion.. if it makes you feel better,
> substitute "FUD" for that three-syllable word.

Can say the same about you. You have wasted my time again, not even close to
the original topic about the firefox bug. I have listen patiently to you
many times more than I wanted to.

Well, times up, I don't really care what you think about anything. Honestly
I think your nothing more than a fruitloop with too much time on your
hands. Your replies are all over the place and at time barely make sense.

So, in short, whatever...

> H1K
>
<snip yet more mindless crap>

Hint: refill your bottle of lithium...