Re: M$ Backs out of releasing a security patch...
From: Imhotep (Imhotep_at_nospam.net)
Date: 09/14/05
- Next message: Rob Slade, doting grandpa of Ryan and Trevor: "REVIEW: "Forensic Discovery", Dan Farmer/Wietse Venema"
- Previous message: Imhotep: "Re: M$ Backs out of releasing a security patch..."
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: M$ Backs out of releasing a security patch..."
- Next in thread: Jim Watt: "Re: M$ Backs out of releasing a security patch..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:10:33 -0400
Jim Watt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:15:31 -0400, Imhotep <Imhotep@nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Jim Watt wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:43:55 -0400, Imhotep <Imhotep@nospam.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Jim Watt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:15:51 -0400, Imhotep <Imhotep@nospam.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> You really are a sad little obsessive wanker.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jim Watt
>>>>> http://www.gibnet.com
>>>>
>>>>...and you a pathetic man who hides behind tough words and antagonist
>>>>ways to hide the fact of your utter uselessness...
>>>
>>> so you say.
>>>
>>>>Still waiting on you description of password hacking. Jim, face it,
>>>>you're all talk...
>>>
>>> I never said I was was going to post information on hacking and have
>>> no intention of doing so.
>>
>>You are doing the "Texas two step" and dancing around the issue. You can,
>>as I did, describe how it works without showing people code. You just do
>>not know and, as such, will not admit it. I know your game Jim. We all
>>know your game. You are a foolish impostor.
>
> Only a Queen gets to use the Royal 'we'
Sorry, I am American. We fought (and kicked your ass) over that topic a long
time ago....
>>As for articles, at least I try to help people here by submitting articles
>>about what is going on in the World of computers.
>
> yes oh great one, what did we do without you ...
Yet, again you're giving the "Texas two step" by not directly addressing the
topic at hand. You did not answer the question about password hacking
because it is beyond your knowledge. Rather than just saying "I am not sure
how that works", you try to change the topic; how pathetic.
Again try using your time actually contributing articles or something
(anything) to this newsgroup instead of being a lame ass fool....but I
guess old habits die hard, eh Jim?
> get a life.
Got a great one Jim, and you?
> --
> Jim Watt
> http://www.gibnet.com
- Next message: Rob Slade, doting grandpa of Ryan and Trevor: "REVIEW: "Forensic Discovery", Dan Farmer/Wietse Venema"
- Previous message: Imhotep: "Re: M$ Backs out of releasing a security patch..."
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: M$ Backs out of releasing a security patch..."
- Next in thread: Jim Watt: "Re: M$ Backs out of releasing a security patch..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
