Re: Security overkill?
From: Robsten (finns.pa.hemsidan_at_min.com)
Date: 07/15/05
- Previous message: The Ghost of General Lee: "Re: Security overkill?"
- In reply to: Louise: "Security overkill?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 13:27:02 GMT
Författare Louise 2005-07-13 :
> Win XP Pro, SP2 with MS firewall turned off. Heavy home/office user
> with cable ISP. Use Firefox 85% of the time. Use Outlook as my
> email/pim.
> I'm wondering whether I really need to run the amount of security
> software I'm running or whether it's taking too much overhead.
> I have a Linksys NAT router. I run Sygate Pro. I run Avast with all
> the shields active.
> I used to run Spysweeper only when I actually wanted to scan my
> machine every week or so.
> I've just switched to Spyware Doctor (was this a good idea?), and I'm
> once again wondering whether I should leave it running "on guard" all
> the time or whether it's unnecessary use of resources.
> Any thoughts about Spyware Doctor and is it bloated - does it use an
> inordinate amount of resources? Is it intrusive?
> TIA
> Louise
I don.t think is overkill, you could use Thunderbird instead of OE and
use moore than one spywaredetector, I recomend two or three. Use
Antivir instead of Avast, its better.
-- http://w1.853.comhem.se/~u85329080/ http://web.comhem.se/~u85329080/indexB.htm http://web.comhem.se/~u85329080/Freeware.htm And I don.t play golf
- Previous message: The Ghost of General Lee: "Re: Security overkill?"
- In reply to: Louise: "Security overkill?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
