Re: Winsow Washer v CyberScrub
From: Rich (spamme_at_mailinator.com)
Date: 06/29/05
- Next message: Joachim Schipper: "Re: Backup question"
- Previous message: Michael J. Pelletier: "Politics and Computers..."
- In reply to: DavidPostill: "Re: Winsow Washer v CyberScrub"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 29 Jun 2005 09:42:43 +0100
DavidPostill <david@postill.org.uk> wrote in
news:ia73c1h3rgm5lrsaleik91je3p6j1fdboc@4ax.com:
> In article <Xns9683BCDD09B79spammemailinatorcom@212.74.114.194>, on 28
> Jun 2005 18:33:16 +0100, Rich wrote:
>
>| Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote in
>| news:ZZIOHHL038519.1553472222@reece.net.au:
>|
>| > Do a google group search for "window washer"
>| > You'll be suprised with what you find
>| >
>| >
>| >
>|
>| CyberScrub is by far superior to Window Washer. Window Washer is a
>| very basic hard drive cleaner. The best and most thorough hard drive
>| cleaner available is Evidence Eliminator.
>
> That would be this "Evidence Eliminitor" would it?
>
> <http://www.spywareinfo.com/articles/evidence-eliminator/>
I do agree with some of what spywareinfo have said, RHS does have some
pretty unethical advertising tactics, but really its the EE affiliates
sites who use them, not the main EE site.
The program itself is very powerful and highly secure, so anyone wanting or
requiring maximum security or privacy should use Evidence Eliminator.
-- http://privacy-protection.no-ip.com
- Next message: Joachim Schipper: "Re: Backup question"
- Previous message: Michael J. Pelletier: "Politics and Computers..."
- In reply to: DavidPostill: "Re: Winsow Washer v CyberScrub"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
