Re: Does anyone recognize this?
From: Ashp (ashleypride_at_gmail.com)
Date: 05/28/05
- Previous message: KBob: "Re: Failed Hard Drive"
- In reply to: nemo_outis: "Re: Does anyone recognize this?"
- Next in thread: nemo_outis: "Re: Does anyone recognize this?"
- Reply: nemo_outis: "Re: Does anyone recognize this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 20:04:23 +0100
nemo_outis wrote:
>
> 1. The user had a persistent/recurring problem and he was
> incapable of diagnosing its source. He was therefore necessarily
> uncertain of whether it was attributable to malware, and, if so, its
> nature and tenacity. Prudence would dictate that he assume the worst.
> Accordingly, he was reduced to reformatting the drive and starting over.
> My post makes clear what a thorough job of "reformatting and starting
> over" entails if one wishes to ensure that any putative malware does not
> survive and the problems recur.
User is a she. The problem is malware, no malware uses any kind of
protected hd area. If the problem is due to hacking/cracking or a
corporate station then yes your advice is correct. Common sense
overrides prudence here.
>More broadly, my post was a heads-up on a little-known feature of
>current
>HDs which, while it has its legitimate uses, is susceptible to abuse,
>including abuse by malware. Moreover, this feature can support some
>especially pernicious forms of malware, (e.g., rootkits), which, by
>their
>nature, are both very hard to detect (especially from within an OS) and
>to eradictate (e.g., a conventional reformat would be useless).
Thanks, a chufty badge is on its way to too.
Ash.
- Previous message: KBob: "Re: Failed Hard Drive"
- In reply to: nemo_outis: "Re: Does anyone recognize this?"
- Next in thread: nemo_outis: "Re: Does anyone recognize this?"
- Reply: nemo_outis: "Re: Does anyone recognize this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|