Any absolute MUST reason for a DMZ?
From: Rock (rock1_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 05/19/05
- Next message: Michael Pelletier: "Re: Any absolute MUST reason for a DMZ?"
- Previous message: null_at_zilch.com: "call for articles"
- Next in thread: Michael Pelletier: "Re: Any absolute MUST reason for a DMZ?"
- Reply: Michael Pelletier: "Re: Any absolute MUST reason for a DMZ?"
- Reply: test: "Re: Any absolute MUST reason for a DMZ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 23:51:47 GMT
Is there any absolute *must have it* reason for a DMZ?
Would the judicious use of port-forwarding be an alternative? As long
as I know each app's port, I think I could use the router to block
unwanted ports.
Maybe the only reason is the router won't tell me if there's a DOS
attack going on. And looking at the logs, I think the log filtering
is "natto-so-good-o". (you need some Japanese to get that one).
But I can't think of another reason. Any others?
Rock
- Next message: Michael Pelletier: "Re: Any absolute MUST reason for a DMZ?"
- Previous message: null_at_zilch.com: "call for articles"
- Next in thread: Michael Pelletier: "Re: Any absolute MUST reason for a DMZ?"
- Reply: Michael Pelletier: "Re: Any absolute MUST reason for a DMZ?"
- Reply: test: "Re: Any absolute MUST reason for a DMZ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|