Re: Avast or Zone Alarm using proxy server?

From: ROBERT S AMP BA Drake (robtsdrake_at_verizon.net)
Date: 02/21/05


Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:58:45 GMT

ZoneAlarm has asked permission to go out on two occasions for me that were
unknown programs. Symantec research identified them as viruses and I was
able to kill them off. They both came through the browser. That alone
gives ZA an advantage over MS FW - IMO
"Martin" <vk2umj@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:37e96lF5dd8cdU1@individual.net...
> "Gerald Vogt" <vogt@spamcop.net> wrote in message
> news:4211561c$0$975$44c9b20d@news2.asahi-net.or.jp...
>> Martin wrote:
>>> "Gerald Vogt" <vogt@spamcop.net> wrote in message
>>> news:420ffad6$0$979$44c9b20d@news2.asahi-net.or.jp...
>>>>Lars-Erik Østerud wrote:
>>> BUT, ZA still does more than Windows FW. Sorry, I have to agree with
>>> Lars-Erik here.. I have previously used Windows SP2 Firewall only and
>>> still encountered problems with things getting in, odd programs
>>> accessing the 'net, etc. Switching to ZA Pro solved all that and more.
>>> I know you
>>
>> You already have "odd programs" on your computer. Why don't you fix that
>> problem and get rid of the "odd programs"? Wouldn't that be the right
>> approach. You seem to fix symptoms instead of fixing the cause. If you
>> have malware on your computer, it is just to late. Hoping that your ZA
>> does prevent contact to the outside for these programs is just not really
>> solving the problem.
>>
>
> But it seems that your "odd programs" would mean anything more than just
> Windows! How many people out there are happy to run only Windows, no
> extra programs, no games, nothing loaded 'just for fun', just so you can
> be 100% sure that the Windows Firewall will work OK? What planet are you
> on? I am not stupid enough to load something on that is nothing more
> that malware or spyware, but that doesn't mean that I want to allow open
> access to everything else loaded on my damn computer! Not unless *I* say
> it is OK! Unless Windows is the *only* thing loaded, it seems to me that
> the Windows Firewall is a little out of its depth...
>
> Let me see, you really want me to trust Microsoft Windows to provide a
> security solution for problems that usually result because of faults in,
> umm, well, Microsoft Windows?????? Hmm......
>
> Windows XP SP2 Firewall provides an excellent firewall for newcomers until
> they install something better. It is better than nothing at all, and for
> some 'dial up' users that do not much on the internet, maybe 5 minutes
> every few days to get mail, then I guess it is all you would need or want.
> Yes, and excellent Firewall for those people..
>
> The rest of us simply like a little more protection and extras, like
> warning if *any* mail program tries to e-mail more than (x) number of
> messages at once (i.e. like a virus may try), or warning if something new
> is trying to gain access to the internet (yes, maybe not fool proof but
> still a lot more that WFW offers)...
>
>>> can never be 100% sure of stopping everything, but ZA sems to stop more
>>> than WFW ever did...
>>
>> Again, ZA may does stop something, but it is usually not the bad guy who
>> manages it anyway.
>
> So what makes you believe that Windows Firewall would be any different?
> Let's see, how many security issues have resulted due to exploits of
> faults in Windows over the years??? It seems that almost all of our
> problems would be solved by not using Windows, but you want us to accept
> that Windows can supply the very best Firewall available??? HAHAHA!!!
>
>>
>>> I also like the fact that when setup correctly ZA lets you 'control'
>>> what programs have internet access whereas Windows FW just lets them
>>> loose!!
>>
>> Have you ever tried to circumvent it? This, too, is pretty easy to
>> circumvent depending on the firewall in place. And in particular teens
>> (as you mentioned your daughter) are extremely creative and quick to
>> learn how to do it as experiences from PCs in youth centres show.
>>
>> Gerald
>
> Well, like anything these days it is impossible to stop everything, isn't
> it. A burglar alarm only makes noise, and deadlocks only means a burglar
> will find another way in. A combination of measures helps to prevent
> problems, which is why I don't rely solely on ZA to provide all my
> security, but it is also why I would NOT rely solely on Windows Firewall
> to provide firewall services!
>
> Let us agree to disagree, shall we? No doubt everyone has their own
> beliefs and preferences......
>
>
>
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Myth of the secure Mac
    ... You are screwed only if you use Outlook. ... >> 1) You fail to apply necessary recommended security patches after ... >> 3) In the case of a firewall, ... >> attached as common Windows files) Make sure this Junk Mail is moved to ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Antivirus Programs
    ... Shenan-you wrote an excellent security book. ... >> May I install Norton AntiVirus and McAfee Security on my ... > Windows is not the only product you likely have on your PC. ... You should at least turn on the built in firewall. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)
  • Re: Microsoft Windows Network & Web Client Network - somebody connected to my computer?
    ... I use Windows XP. ... Doing the best I can at absorbing the necessary information about security. ... > UPDATES and PATCHES ... You should at least turn on the built in firewall. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
  • Re: Messenger Service security breach
    ... > The attached graphic is an example of a Windows security ... > We've put off installation of a firewall appliance between ... > could plug the security holes on individual computers. ... downloading and installing MyNetWatchman or Dshield. ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: Guide to secure installtion of IIS 5
    ... don't forget a well-configured firewall. ... Do not put the computer onto the network or the Internet until after the ... Follow the instructions for hardening Windows and IIS at ... Install all service packs and security fixes from Microsoft and otherwise ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)

Quantcast