Re: Internet Firewall FAQ in Dutch
From: Jim Watt (jimwatt_at_aol.no_way)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Internet Firewall FAQ in Dutch"
- Previous message: Jigsaw: "Is this true - windows and URL logging?"
- In reply to: bishop_at_speakeasy.net: "Re: Internet Firewall FAQ in Dutch"
- Next in thread: Walter Roberson: "Re: Internet Firewall FAQ in Dutch"
- Reply: Walter Roberson: "Re: Internet Firewall FAQ in Dutch"
- Reply:(deleted message) bishop_at_speakeasy.net: "Re: Internet Firewall FAQ in Dutch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:30:52 +0100
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:01:25 -0600, bishop@speakeasy.net wrote:
>In alt.computer.security Jim Watt <jimwatt@aol.no_way> wrote:
>> Nothing against those who speak languages other than English
>> but newgroups are really for discussion rather than lengthy reference
>> material in multiple languages and machine translation generates
>> spam rather than useful information.
>
>Perhaps you ought to reconsider your definition of "spam."
I know a lot about it and wrote a Spam analysis program
in 1969, errr what were you doing at the time?
>It does not mean "stuff I do not want to read."
The stuff posted is stuff nobody wants to read and is
inappropriate content.
-- Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Internet Firewall FAQ in Dutch"
- Previous message: Jigsaw: "Is this true - windows and URL logging?"
- In reply to: bishop_at_speakeasy.net: "Re: Internet Firewall FAQ in Dutch"
- Next in thread: Walter Roberson: "Re: Internet Firewall FAQ in Dutch"
- Reply: Walter Roberson: "Re: Internet Firewall FAQ in Dutch"
- Reply:(deleted message) bishop_at_speakeasy.net: "Re: Internet Firewall FAQ in Dutch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
