Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?
From: donnie (donnie_at_queyosepa.org)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: donnie: "Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?"
- Previous message: Bit Tamer: "Trends in security code reviews?"
- In reply to: J. S. Jackson: "Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?"
- Next in thread: Moe Trin: "Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:57:24 GMT
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:07:12 -0500, "J. S. Jackson"
<nospam@mybox.thanks> wrote:
>donnie wrote:
>
>> Outlook automatically blocks attachments unless you stand your head
>> and spit nickels. If I ask someone to send me one I would like to be
>> able to retrieve it.
>
>I think you're referring to Outlook *Express* my friend.
>
>Regardless, it's a matter of unchecking *one* box in the options menu. What
>a terrible burden, to have to do all that configuring!? ;-)
#############################
No, it's Outlook that automatically blocks the attachments and on some
versions it's not as simple as unchecking or checking a box.
donnie.
- Next message: donnie: "Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?"
- Previous message: Bit Tamer: "Trends in security code reviews?"
- In reply to: J. S. Jackson: "Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?"
- Next in thread: Moe Trin: "Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]