Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?
From: al ({ask_me}_at_blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 01/27/05
- Next message: Jay Calvert: "Re: Trend Micro Anyone"
- Previous message: Michael J. Pelletier: "Re: Update while you can..."
- In reply to: donnie: "Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?"
- Next in thread: donnie: "Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?"
- Reply: donnie: "Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:04:28 GMT
"donnie" <donnie@queyosepa.org> wrote in message
news:jn7gv0tu6hf02fuc1j0bb5bd7cfqpikgd5@4ax.com...
> Go w/ w2k
> donnie
There's no reason in the world to go for Win2k. It's buggy, slow and way
less secure than WinXP SP2. You say you're building a new PC ... even more
reason to only consider WinXP.
a
- Next message: Jay Calvert: "Re: Trend Micro Anyone"
- Previous message: Michael J. Pelletier: "Re: Update while you can..."
- In reply to: donnie: "Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?"
- Next in thread: donnie: "Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?"
- Reply: donnie: "Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. Windows Xp Pro - Which is more Secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|