Re: Instant Messaging
From: sh4d03 (sh4d03_at_TPG.com.au)
Date: 01/18/05
- Next message: Adrian: "Re: Firewall problems"
- Previous message: Dick Harrison: "Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware Spyware Scan Results (poll)"
- In reply to: David M. Dinner: "Re: Instant Messaging"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:25:38 +1100
David M. Dinner wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> While I have never used Miranda-IM I would have to lean my support to
> GAIM (gaim.org). The client will use various messaging protocols and is
> stable in both the Windows and *Nix environments.
>
> David Michael Dinner <ddinner@obtix.net> 570/947-3110
> Owner, Obtix Networks: http://www.obtix.net
> Personal Site: http://obtix.org
> Public Key: http://www.obtix.net/~ddinner/dmd-pub-key
>
>
> ** INTERNET EMAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE **
> This email contains confidential information which may also be legally
> privileged and which is intended only for the use of the recipient(s)
> named above. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
> notified that reading, forwarding, or copying of this email; or the
> taking of any action in reliance on its contents, may be strictly
> prohibited.
>
>
>
>
> sh4d03 wrote:
> | Variant wrote:
> |
> |> John Hyde <EJHyd@netscape.net> wrote:
> |>
> |>> My daughter insists on instant messaging using AIM and I am not in
> |>> the process of cleaning up her system (XP Home).
> |>> I'm told that AIM is terribly insecure. I also seem to recall a
> |>> message here about a replacement that does not suffer from these
> |>> flaws. But I can't seem to find it. Does anyone know of a secure
> |>> instant messenger client?
> |>>
> |>> Thanks,
> |>> John
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |> GAIM
> |>
> |> http://gaim.sourceforge.net/
> |>
> | I'm a huge fan of GAIM when I'm using my Linux machines (largely as it
> | is essentially the only 'decent' option). As far as Windows is concerned
> | as I've already stated Miranda-IM is my favourite so far. This is just
> | my opinion and yours could well be different. Have a go at the three
> | applications we've all mentioned and see which one suits your
> | needs/desires the best.
> |
> | Sh4d03
> |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFB6t3t7J5spqW1Z20RAvd4AJ9J/OVvudlXOltmZnlfbj5ZkSgwWQCglCuF
> GrvZZE6cBeCJywsPp6GBM1g=
> =Fkfk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Your opinion is noted and valid. I hold nothing against that, just
venting what I believe to give the most comprehensive reply to the
initial post as possible.
Sh4d03
-- If you require more assistance or if my suggestion works please E-mail me at sh4d03 [at] TPG [dot] com [dot] au. Additionally, if you are able to provide assistance to me and wish to E-mail me directly please also feel free to contact me in this manner. Please ensure you include "Newsgroup_sh4d03" in the subject line. Please pay attention to the capitilisation. Emails sent to this the above address which do NOT contain "Newsgroup_sh4d03" in the subject line will fail to reach me. Thanks, Sh4d03
- Next message: Adrian: "Re: Firewall problems"
- Previous message: Dick Harrison: "Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware Spyware Scan Results (poll)"
- In reply to: David M. Dinner: "Re: Instant Messaging"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|