Re: Doubled-up security??
From: bowgus (bowgus_at_rogers.com)
Date: 01/06/05
- Previous message: Moe Trin: "Re: Lockout a country."
- In reply to: nemo outis: "Re: Doubled-up security??"
- Next in thread: EDOOD: "Re: Doubled-up security??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:20:36 -0500
Exactly ... and that was the "humor" in my original response ... "Why not
just use one algorithm, 3 times ... wait a minute :-) ... referring to 3DES
(using 3 keys of 64 bits less the 8 bits parity) is 168 bits.
<nemo outis@erewhon.com (nemo outis)> wrote in message
news:J6KCd.700364$nl.161279@pd7tw3no...
> In article <w1KCd.700323$nl.119542@pd7tw3no>, nemo outis@erewhon.com (nemo
outis) wrote:
> >In article <0KSdnWVpS59gwkbcRVn-rA@rogers.com>, "bowgus"
<bowgus@rogers.com>
> > wrote:
> >>If a key length were say 56 bits, and an algorithm was applied say 3
times,
> >>then effective key length would be 168 bits.
> >
> >
> >Uhhh, no. 56 bits applied three times would be equivalent to
> >57.585 bits.
> >
> >A 256-bit algorithm (AES, say) is not twice as difficult to crack
> >as a 128-bit version, but rather 2^128 times as hard!
> >
> >Regards,
> >
>
> A clarification:
>
> Triple DES, however, uses three separate keys, one for each
> encryption. In that case doing 56 bit encryption three times
> DOES result in (effective) 192-bit encryption.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
- Previous message: Moe Trin: "Re: Lockout a country."
- In reply to: nemo outis: "Re: Doubled-up security??"
- Next in thread: EDOOD: "Re: Doubled-up security??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|