Re: Top Secret Crypto 3.70
From: Johan Wevers (johanw_at_vulcan.xs4all.nl)
Date: 01/02/05
- Next message: jerryg50_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Norton Internet Security and SP2"
- Previous message: nemo outis: "Re: Which Product"
- In reply to: headcrash: "Re: Top Secret Crypto 3.70"
- Next in thread: headcrash: "Re: Top Secret Crypto 3.70"
- Reply: headcrash: "Re: Top Secret Crypto 3.70"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:59:16 GMT
headcrash <headcrash@platter.com> wrote:
>I agree with you about RC5. Way elegant. That is a great example.
>I find the SKIPJACK algorithm to be incredibly elegant, as well, both
>in design and capability.
I just looked at it (the old skipjack module code for GnuPG 1.0), and
the code looks elegant, except for the array of 256 bytes.
Unfortunately Skipjack isn't secure, so wether or not it's elegant,
it doesn't match the second criterium.
-- ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site: johanw@vulcan.xs4all.nl // http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html
- Next message: jerryg50_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Norton Internet Security and SP2"
- Previous message: nemo outis: "Re: Which Product"
- In reply to: headcrash: "Re: Top Secret Crypto 3.70"
- Next in thread: headcrash: "Re: Top Secret Crypto 3.70"
- Reply: headcrash: "Re: Top Secret Crypto 3.70"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|