Re: Malware Triangle
From: kurt wismer (kurtw_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 12/04/04
- Next message: Pete: "Re: Evidence Eliminator v Encase"
- Previous message: donnie: "Re: Evidence Eliminator v Encase"
- In reply to: Ant: "Re: Malware Triangle"
- Next in thread: xmp: "Re: Malware Triangle"
- Reply: xmp: "Re: Malware Triangle"
- Reply: Ant: "Re: Malware Triangle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 23:47:13 -0500
Ant wrote:
[snip]
> I'm not comfortable with calling email or html documents "programs",
> but was suggesting they should be treated as such because of the way
> they are mostly handled.
ok, lets compromise....
i'll agree that visiting web pages often poses a risk of malicious code
execution if you'll agree that it is not the html language but the
value-added web browsing experience that browser developers have
created that poses the real risks...
-- "maxwell can tell he's in hell just wants you to visit him there same old game that he's playin' his rules are never fair"
- Next message: Pete: "Re: Evidence Eliminator v Encase"
- Previous message: donnie: "Re: Evidence Eliminator v Encase"
- In reply to: Ant: "Re: Malware Triangle"
- Next in thread: xmp: "Re: Malware Triangle"
- Reply: xmp: "Re: Malware Triangle"
- Reply: Ant: "Re: Malware Triangle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|