Re: Is your data really secure?
From: Leythos (void_at_nowhere.org)
Date: 11/10/04
- Next message: Mike: "Re: AIM "privacy" issue"
- Previous message: Josh Mandell: "Re: Is your data really secure?"
- In reply to: Josh Mandell: "Re: Is your data really secure?"
- Next in thread: iplomŽ: "Re: Is your data really secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:54:49 GMT
In article <419209be$1_2@127.0.0.1>, JMandell@ISP.com says...
> In your opinion.
No, actually it's in most Usenet FAQ's, been an accepted Policy since
the 80's, and has in most ISP's Acceptable Use Policy documents.
Just like top-posting a reply - it's not the norm in Usenet groups in
general.
>
> Leythos wrote:
> > In article <96fe32d3.0411092344.22915dc@posting.google.com>,
> > cindytaylor123343@yahoo.com says...
> >
> > "Exposing" your product, or any product for which the poster receives
> > some form of gain, is called SPAM and is against the charter. Any
> > computer professional would already know this as well as any person with
> > ethics. Posting to non-forsale groups is considered SPAM and in bad
> > taste in the Usenet community, it's always been in bad taste.
> >
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
>
-- -- spamfree999@rrohio.com (Remove 999 to reply to me)
- Next message: Mike: "Re: AIM "privacy" issue"
- Previous message: Josh Mandell: "Re: Is your data really secure?"
- In reply to: Josh Mandell: "Re: Is your data really secure?"
- Next in thread: iplomŽ: "Re: Is your data really secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
