Re: Firewall ???
From: \ (dvader_at_deathstar.mil)
Date: 10/20/04
- Next message: Nicholas Albright: "Re: Firewall ???"
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: is-6B9S7.exe?"
- In reply to: prettygirl: "Firewall ???"
- Next in thread: prettygirl: "Re: Firewall ???"
- Reply: prettygirl: "Re: Firewall ???"
- Reply: Nicholas Albright: "Re: Firewall ???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:34:43 -0400
>Windows98
>Roadrunner cable subscriber
>All MS Windows patches installed
>AV program up to date
>TCP/IP bindings secure
>Netbios over TCP/IP disabled
>So why do I need to run a firewall?
I will try to give you a straight answer, although I expect to get jumped on by
all the resident security experts. If your system is as described, you should
have no open ports. You can verify this by opening a DOS box and running
netstat:
C:\windows\netstat -an
If the result shows
Active Connections
Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
with no entries, then all your ports are closed. If all your ports are closed,
you don't need a firewall to defend against external attacks. You may, however,
want a firewall to monitor traffic or control applications. Among other things,
it can spot programs that include spyware. It is also a great learning tool for
understanding how the internet works. I recommend that you get one, even if you
can live without it.
-- Dave "Crash" Dummy - A weapon of mass destruction crash@gpick.com?subject=Techtalk (Do not alter!) http://lists.gpick.com
- Next message: Nicholas Albright: "Re: Firewall ???"
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: is-6B9S7.exe?"
- In reply to: prettygirl: "Firewall ???"
- Next in thread: prettygirl: "Re: Firewall ???"
- Reply: prettygirl: "Re: Firewall ???"
- Reply: Nicholas Albright: "Re: Firewall ???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|