Re: Cracking admin password on Win 2000; then putting it back?

From: donnie (donnie_at_queyosepa.net)
Date: 10/10/04 

Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 23:10:17 GMT

On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 03:27:04 GMT, Celtic Leroy
<I_am__celtic_leroy__san_verbage@myhost.com> wrote:

>donnie <donnie@queyosepa.net> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 10:27:20 GMT, Leythos <void@nowhere.org> wrote:
>>
>>>> ####################
>>>> That brings me back to my original point. If you don't want to help,
>>>> you don't have to, just skip the post. There is no reason to answer
>>>> something that wasn't asked.
>>>> donnie
>>>
>>>That brings up a interesting idea for you - if you stand by and watch
>>>someone break the law, did you know that you are also guilty?
>>#####################
>>That's not true. Besides, I wasn't watching him do anything. I don't
>>even know what he looks like or if he was lying about the situation in
>>the first place.
>>donnie.
>
>So your first thought is that this person is telling you the truth,
>and that he has legitimate reason for wanting clandestine access to
>something which does not belong to him? I bet if Bin Laden wanted
>plans for all the access points of the Whitehouse, with diagrams of
>the security, and he said he was there to "Fix the security alarms and
>don't want to set them off.", you would believe him and send the info
>without even a question? I seem to recall a phrase use often in WWII,
>"Loose lips sink ships".
#######################
No, my first thought was he wanted a program to which I directed him.
I didn't care about his reason but you did. None of that has anything
to do w/ BL or the whitehouse. That is a very poor analogy and I won't
even entertain it.

Quantcast