Re: Are WAV files dangerous?
From: Mimic (dev_at_null.net)
Date: 08/16/04
- Previous message: kurt wismer: "Re: Are WAV files dangerous?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: Are WAV files dangerous?"
- Next in thread: Criminal Element: "Re: Are WAV files dangerous?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 23:55:35 +0100
Jim Watt wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:25:37 -0500, Newman <fake@fake.org> wrote:
>
>
>>read previous posts to find out why you're wrong.
>
>
> Indeed
>
>
>>and your website is hard to read.
>
>
> It is, however I find with that sort of dumb colour combination
> you can read the text if you select it. Thats about the only way
> blue on blue works.
>
> Backgrounds often detract and become tedious.
>
> --
> Jim Watt
> http://www.gibnet.com
indeed, is find his colorscheme bad. The red against the blue flares and
hurts my eyes :P
-- Mimic "The voices have stopped now. But they had some good ideas." "Without knowledge you have fear. With fear you create your own nightmares." ZGF0YWZsZXhAY2FubmFiaXNtYWlsLmNvbQ== [ www.hidemyemail.net ]
- Previous message: kurt wismer: "Re: Are WAV files dangerous?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: Are WAV files dangerous?"
- Next in thread: Criminal Element: "Re: Are WAV files dangerous?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|