Re: Firewalls.....

From: Leythos (void_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 08/12/04


Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:10:34 GMT

In article <jc4mh053vla3m49ejqo0rd5orgpolphs0j@4ax.com>,
I_am__celtic_leroy__san_verbage@myhost.com says...
> Don't take this wrong, I've been working with computers (operator,
> programmer, network engineer, systems administrator...) for over 30
> years and if there's one thing I've learned, it's that NO ONE will
> follow your directions if you make them too difficult to understand.
> (e.g. Your 10 step plan to a secure network).

The problem is that you have to educate the users or they will never be
able to protect themselves.

If you just make it as simple as getting a glass of milk they will
always be vulnerable.

While I can understand that we need to make it as simple as possible,
there is NO excuse for not trying to tell them about SSID's, Channels,
WEP, MAC Filtering, etc... These are important things when it comes to
securing their WIRELESS routers.

I personally know people that setup wireless systems, for businesses and
homes, they were completely open and being used by other people without
permission and without knowledge of the network owners. Since most
people have file/printer sharing enabled, most people don't use
passwords, it makes it very easy to get into a home/SOHO users computer,
copy their Quicken/Quickbooks files and any other information that might
contain account/ssn's and do with it what you want.

Being ignorant of security might be an excuse for some, but having a
good handle on security and then not explaining it to anyone that asks
is reprehensible. I don't care if 10 steps are to much for the OP, there
could be people reading that post that learn from it, actually implement
all of it (or even some of it), and benefit from it. Not everyone that
reads these posts actually replies.

Look at it this way, if you only tell the person that they need to run
Linux and stop using IE, they are less likely to do that than they are
to follow 10 steps. Most people could not install their Window XP OS let
alone find and download and then burn the ISO for a linux distro. Even
if they get it installed they won't have a clue as to how to secure it
(and don't think it doesn't need secured) or to update the OS/apps
before going live. Teach them how to protect their systems and data,
they will get the idea sooner or later.

-- 
--
spamfree999@rrohio.com
(Remove 999 to reply to me)


Relevant Pages

  • Why Easy To Use Software Is Putting You At Risk
    ... Anyone who has been working with computers for a long time will have noticed ... because DNS does not configure properly or security permissions are relaxed ... Is It Also Secure ... guarantee that no one really knows for sure, not even Microsoft developers. ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • RE: Why Easy To Use Software Is Putting You At Risk
    ... Can Easy To Use Software Also Be Secure ... Anyone who has been working with computers for a long time will have noticed ... because DNS does not configure properly or security permissions are relaxed ... guarantee that no one really knows for sure, not even Microsoft developers. ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: Final Year Project Brainstorming
    ... I think a project that contrasts the security of Ubuntu and Windows ... computers were very old so they were told they would have to purchase new ... money to get new computers at a lower cost, install ubuntu, and secure the ... Figure the cost of IT person for Vista vs ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • RE: Why Easy To Use Software Is Putting You At Risk
    ... Anyone who has been working with computers for a long time ... because DNS does not configure properly or security ... Is It Also Secure ... Microsoft developers. ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • << Small Biz Server news the week of May 2, 2004>>
    ... take the time to test and install MS04-011. ... The security package Microsoft Unified Security Protocol ... gaining control of large networks of computers. ... Committee said new laws were needed to stop the ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz)