Re: Do not use SAFEBOOT - yep, another repeat bitchgram from the same author
From: Anonymous (nobody_at_nox.lemuria.org)
Date: 07/11/04
- Next message: Mimic: "Re: http://www.privacy.net/"
- Previous message: Rach: "BS7799"
- Maybe in reply to: *Vanguard*: "Re: Do not use SAFEBOOT - yep, another repeat bitchgram from the same author"
- Next in thread: Jim Watt: "Re: Do not use SAFEBOOT - yep, another repeat bitchgram from the same author"
- Reply:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: Do not use SAFEBOOT - yep, another repeat bitchgram from the same author"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:06:41 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:09:18 -0500, you wrote:
>
> starwars said in
> news:777121e8a4010dca7674ffe658aa118f@tatooine.homelinux.net:
> > On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:49:15 GMT, you wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <e9b30ca771f852aa96c7438b19abf559@nox.lemuria.org>,
> >> nobody@nox.lemuria.org says...
> >>> Yes, actually, I thought that weekly posts would provide some
> >>> protective effect for potential other sufferers while not
> >>> appearing so often as to upset others. It is a difficult
> >>> balance to achieve; I regret that you find the protection of
> >>> others upsetting.
> >>
> >> Your posting indicates that you didn't understand the product, didn't
> >> understand much about computers, and that you are posting to just
> >> slam the company, not to protect others.
> >>
> >> Now, you've posted it a couple times - leave it alone. None of us use
> >> the product anyway.
> >>
> >> --
> >> --
> >> spamfree999@rrohio.com
> >> (Remove 999 to reply to me)
> >
> > Dear Mr. Liethos:
> >
> > With all due respect, my posting indicates none of what you say
> > that it does; simply claiming that it is so does not make it so.
> >
> > I have used PGP for many years both for file encryption and
> > pgpdisk with never once a problem; my problems began only with
> > the installation of SAFEBOOT SOLO from CONTROL BREAK
> > INTERNATIONAL.
> >
> > I am sorry that you do not like the posts, but I must try to
> > protect as many people as possible from the harms that I have
> > suffered. Thank you for your interest and participation, though.
> >
> > Bob
>
> And now you are "starwars", huh? And, "With all due respect", you can't even correctly spell the names of your respondents.
>
> starwars, aka Bob Jones, aka A.Melon, aka Anonymous, aka Fritz Wuehler, aka privacy.at is/uses:
The names "starwars" ...etc. are the names of the remailer
servers, they are not monikers assigned by the poster and the
poster has no control over it.
- Next message: Mimic: "Re: http://www.privacy.net/"
- Previous message: Rach: "BS7799"
- Maybe in reply to: *Vanguard*: "Re: Do not use SAFEBOOT - yep, another repeat bitchgram from the same author"
- Next in thread: Jim Watt: "Re: Do not use SAFEBOOT - yep, another repeat bitchgram from the same author"
- Reply:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: Do not use SAFEBOOT - yep, another repeat bitchgram from the same author"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|