Re: "hardware" firewalls
From: Mike (info_at_michaelmoyse.co.uk)
Date: 06/28/04
- Next message: news: "Re: "hardware" firewalls"
- Previous message: Bit Twister: "Re: trojans"
- In reply to: news: ""hardware" firewalls"
- Next in thread: news: "Re: "hardware" firewalls"
- Reply: news: "Re: "hardware" firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:19:59 +0100
news wrote:
> I canīt find any tests using hacking atempts for "hardware" firewalls. Do
> you know if there are any published?
Visit www.watchguard.com. There is a very good 'showdown' video which
shows some attempts on various hardware firewalls.
>
> The advantage with using a "hardware" firewall is that it works on a
> separated and more secured OS??
Yup, plus the fact that a stupid user is not allowed anywhere near it.
>
> Itīs the same thing as placing a 386 with Linux and a software firewall
> between internet and the pc you use?
Pretty much so. The Watchguards run a hardend *nux OS.
> I thought that for outbound threats perhaps an antitrojan or antivirus will
> be well enough.
Nope.
------------------------------------
Real email to mike. The header email is a spam trap and you will be
blacklisted.
- Next message: news: "Re: "hardware" firewalls"
- Previous message: Bit Twister: "Re: trojans"
- In reply to: news: ""hardware" firewalls"
- Next in thread: news: "Re: "hardware" firewalls"
- Reply: news: "Re: "hardware" firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]