Re: SOPHOS Antivirus

From: Don Kelloway (dkelloway_at_commodon.com)
Date: 05/30/04

  • Next message: Shane: "Re: Bottom vs. Top Posting"
    Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 07:11:20 GMT
    
    

    "Billy K" <billycomp@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:40b8578f$1@news.comindico.com.au...
    > Sorry for before, I'm just an admin who is honestly very disapointed
    with a
    > product.
    >
    > I work in an envirnoment that deals with other International firms
    mainly in
    > Asia. We use Sophos anti-virus on servers and clients. All updates
    come
    > through automatically from a share which is updated as soon as any
    updates
    > become available. We definately run current updates.
    >
    > Every major virus to hit the net, we get it. Your right though,
    Sophos
    > detect all of these, however fails to deal with the virus accordingly.
    > Having the file deteled, moved, shredded, copied and etc is not really
    a
    > fantastic option. My question is, how do these files become infected
    in the
    > first place if Sophos was doing it's job.
    >
    > We have a concern that Sophos will one day delete some important
    document
    > because we have it set to delete viruses. In the environment I work
    in we
    > get multiple viruses a week, we have to keep it on the highest
    possible
    > setting.
    >
    > The disinfect option is just there for good looks. I've never had a
    file
    > disinfected. The interface with the 3 modes, Immediate, Scheduled,
    and IC
    > client is just not practicle. The same configuration must be made 3
    times.
    >
    > The SAV administration tool is OK, gets the IDE updates out there, but
    this
    > must be the only reason large organisations use SOPHOS. It does have
    easy
    > deployment.
    >

    Though I understand what you're saying, I can't offer any comment other
    than to say that I do not subscribe to the philosophy of fixing virus
    infected attachments. If it's a virus, it's deleted. Plain and simple.
    My reasoning behind this is that I only rely on an AV product for it's
    detection abilities and nothing more.

    -- 
    Best regards, from Don Kelloway of Commodon Communications
    Visit http://www.commodon.com to learn about the "Threats to Your
    Security on the Internet".
    

  • Next message: Shane: "Re: Bottom vs. Top Posting"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: SOPHOS Antivirus
      ... We use Sophos anti-virus on servers and clients. ... > through automatically from a share which is updated as soon as any updates ... however fails to deal with the virus accordingly. ... > because we have it set to delete viruses. ...
      (alt.computer.security)
    • Re: Virus Scanning Software for FreeBSD
      ... I have been using Amavis and Sophos together for a while now. ... > Updates are monthly CDs and urgent updates are available as downloads. ... new virus that "we have been scanning for this virus since 9:30AM yesterday." ... Were they truly clever ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • Re: SOPHOS Antivirus
      ... Your right though, Sophos ... however fails to deal with the virus accordingly. ... updates for every 4 hours on the server and have the server push the ... updates to the desktops. ...
      (alt.computer.security)
    • Dialling out problem
      ... I have just done a load of windows and updates from MS and for ... some reason, every time I boot up, something on my system attempts to ... I had a virus - but two virus ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: SOPHOS Antivirus
      ... I work for a reseller of Sophos antivirus. ... The virus signatures only update once a ... >> By definition a firewall has no mail filtering function. ... NAV Corporate and SBE provide all that you state SOPHOS ...
      (alt.computer.security)