Re: Windows vulnerability vs Linux vulnerability [Re: Would a firewall
From: Lars M. Hansen (badnews_at_hansenonline.net)
Date: 05/06/04
- Next message: Help Me: "word 2002"
- Previous message: Mimic: "Re: How secure is your Windows Computer?"
- In reply to: Rowland: "Re: Windows vulnerability vs Linux vulnerability [Re: Would a firewall"
- Next in thread: Rowland: "Re: Windows vulnerability vs Linux vulnerability [Re: Would a firewall"
- Reply: Rowland: "Re: Windows vulnerability vs Linux vulnerability [Re: Would a firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 20:35:24 GMT
On Thu, 06 May 2004 12:10:53 -0400, Rowland spoketh
>1. So security patches are a bad thing? In that case, don't install any!
No, the patches are not bad, but there's a correlation between
vulnerabilities and patches that you're missing. Usually, there's a
patch for a vulnerability, thus by counting patches one can approximate
the number of vulnerabilities.
Lars M. Hansen
www.hansenonline.net
Remove "bad" from my e-mail address to contact me.
"If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done?"
- Next message: Help Me: "word 2002"
- Previous message: Mimic: "Re: How secure is your Windows Computer?"
- In reply to: Rowland: "Re: Windows vulnerability vs Linux vulnerability [Re: Would a firewall"
- Next in thread: Rowland: "Re: Windows vulnerability vs Linux vulnerability [Re: Would a firewall"
- Reply: Rowland: "Re: Windows vulnerability vs Linux vulnerability [Re: Would a firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|