Re: Google Groups

From: Leythos (void_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 04/20/04 

Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:41:14 GMT

In article <4084d00c$0$67526$ee9da40f@news.wanadoo.nl>,
this@ddress.is.invalid says...
> Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> > In article <4083a583$0$64621$4a441750@news.wanadoo.nl>,
> > Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> [Subject changed. Strip ("was: ...") part, if present, when responding.]
> >>
> >> Scott B. <bgates@example.invalid> wrote:
> >> [deleted]
> >> > For some readers who may not know what I meant by dejagoogle, it is a
> >> > term for Google's Usenet archive, and here is a URL:
> >> > http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search
> >>
> >> Why don't you call it "Google Groups"? That is what Google calls it
> >> and that is good enough for me and most other people. "dejagoogle" is
> >> just a meaningless, confusing and wrong term.
> >
> > He must be an older user. Before Google acquired it, it was DejaNews.
> > And even after several years, he can't let it go.
>
> Yes, I know. That is why I said "confusing".
>
> Frank "A really old user, who uses the *right* term." Slootweg

There are some of us that were on before Deja started, some of us
started with old 110 Baud modems in the very early 80's. BM is one of
the people I respect in these groups. 

-- 
--
spamfree999@rrohio.com
(Remove 999 to reply to me)