Re: Security of whois database
From: Colonel Flagg (colonel_flagg_at_NOSOUPFORJ00internetwarzone.org)
Date: 04/19/04
- Next message: Frank Slootweg: "Google Groups (was: incoming mail without information in the from, to, subject fields)"
- Previous message: Rod S: "Re: Best Internet Security Programs?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: Security of whois database"
- Next in thread: Jim Watt: "Re: Security of whois database"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 05:28:27 -0400
In article <h0u68050l8vmktons9rojqq1tnerag8gre@4ax.com>,
jimwatt@aol.no_way says...
> so lets see what Microsoft do about the
> original issue.
>
> --
> Jim Watt
> http://www.gibnet.com
>
oh! you mean the original issue that's been around for, like 5-6 years?
now i understand, ever since JIM! discovered it for himself (like a week
ago), Microsoft will bend over backwards to nip it in the bud.
lol.
-- Colonel Flagg http://www.internetwarzone.org/ Privacy at a click: http://www.cotse.net Q: How many Bill Gates does it take to change a lightbulb? A: None, he just defines Darkness? as the new industry standard..." "...I see stupid people."
- Next message: Frank Slootweg: "Google Groups (was: incoming mail without information in the from, to, subject fields)"
- Previous message: Rod S: "Re: Best Internet Security Programs?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: Security of whois database"
- Next in thread: Jim Watt: "Re: Security of whois database"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
