Re: Abtrusion - Anyone use this?
From: Kerodo (kerodo~nospam~kenny_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/27/04
- Next message: ---= Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí =---: "Re: p2p security"
- Previous message: Rowdy Yates: "Re: Getting worried about the CISSP"
- In reply to: Bogus: "Re: Abtrusion - Anyone use this?"
- Next in thread: Kerodo: "Re: Abtrusion - Anyone use this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:29:12 GMT
"Bogus" <Bogusname@Privacy.net> wrote in
news:c44qli$2ek01e$1@ID-152061.news.uni-berlin.de:
>> I just tried SSM and had some trouble with it always thinking that
>> Outlook had changed every time I loaded Outlook. And there was no
>> way to change or fix that.
>
> SSM has multiple levels of "tuning"; Outlook can be readily
> accomodated - but it takes a little thoughtfullness
Oops... Looks like I should have given it more of a chance. I admit that I
dismissed it pretty quickly...
>> I also just installed Abtrusion and it looks very nice so far. It
>> didn't have any problems with Outlook, so there must be something
>> wrong with SSM.
>
> Not at all! But you should stick with Abtrusion ( or drop it as
well) :-) .
Yep, I dropped Abtrusion as well since I couldn't get some utilities to run
with it running. Seemed more trouble than it was worth..
Kerio 4 has a feature that does something similar. You can set it to
question every executable that runs on your machine and ask for permission
to run it. So that, plus it's normal features, plus my NAV should be
enough protection.
-- Kerodo
- Next message: ---= Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí =---: "Re: p2p security"
- Previous message: Rowdy Yates: "Re: Getting worried about the CISSP"
- In reply to: Bogus: "Re: Abtrusion - Anyone use this?"
- Next in thread: Kerodo: "Re: Abtrusion - Anyone use this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|