Re: Security & Encryption FAQ - Revision 18
From: know-doubt about it (zzz_at_zzz.zzz)
Date: 03/08/04
- Next message: Vigilance Monitoring: "openssl on RH question"
- Previous message: Fuzzy Logic: "Re: anti-spam software for home use"
- In reply to: That Other Guy: "Re: Security & Encryption FAQ - Revision 18"
- Next in thread: Arthur T.: "Re: Security & Encryption FAQ - Revision 18"
- Reply: Arthur T.: "Re: Security & Encryption FAQ - Revision 18"
- Reply: An: "Re: Security & Encryption FAQ - Revision 18"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 8 Mar 2004 15:27:04 -0600
That Other Guy <somebody@someplace.net> wrote in
news:lukn40pnc5ijrv5fhh6llddmqv7fksd0sk@4ax.com:
> Take a look at this page from the Cotse website concerning US
> cooperation with China's crackdown on internet disidents.
> http://www.cotse.net/privacy/us_china.htm
>
> This sort of cooperation usually works both ways. Since Hong Kong is
> under Chinese sovereignty it would seem that the Privacy.li Hong Kong
> server is not such a safe bet after all for those in the US. If I
> were thinking about using the Liechtenstein server I would take a
> close look at that country to see if there are similar issues.
>
> tog
Thanks for the info TOG. There are a number of things in the Security Faq.
Reading about privacy issues in the UK from the Faq, I wonder about using
PuTTY software from the U.K. Doing research on anonymizer.com I found
things that may make that provider unsuitable to some for privacy.
- Next message: Vigilance Monitoring: "openssl on RH question"
- Previous message: Fuzzy Logic: "Re: anti-spam software for home use"
- In reply to: That Other Guy: "Re: Security & Encryption FAQ - Revision 18"
- Next in thread: Arthur T.: "Re: Security & Encryption FAQ - Revision 18"
- Reply: Arthur T.: "Re: Security & Encryption FAQ - Revision 18"
- Reply: An: "Re: Security & Encryption FAQ - Revision 18"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|