Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus
From: ± Žete ± (user_at_hostname.domain)
Date: 01/10/04
- Next message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Previous message: Duh!: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- In reply to: Pictures: "Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Next in thread: Mimic: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:18:12 +0000
On 10 Jan 2004 06:13:20 GMT, whilst in NewsFroup alt.computer.security,
Pictures <givemeyouraddy@msn.com> articulated the following sentiments :
>http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/security/trojan.html
>
>Some of you people might want to check out this website because if your
>on a Windows Platform and you didn't disable the Windows Services which
>are left open by Microsoft and then installed a Firewall, your computer
>has a high risk of hosting a Trojan Horse and a Backdoor.
>
>Tracker
You typed 'trojan horse' into Google and pasted one of the first links you
saw into your poast.
That pretty much covers 99.99% of all your 'output' spammer.
Egrads,
Pete.
- Next message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Previous message: Duh!: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- In reply to: Pictures: "Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Next in thread: Mimic: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
