Re: bottom posting
From: Dazz (cashdj_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/09/04
- Next message: Dazz: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Previous message: Dazz: "Re: bottom posting"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: bottom posting"
- Next in thread: Jim: "Re: bottom posting"
- Reply: Jim: "Re: bottom posting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:32:44 +1000
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:49:32 +0100, Jim Watt <jimwatt@aol.no_way>
wrote:
>On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:17:57 +1000, Dazz <cashdj@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:14:32 -0500, Jim <me@mail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>It appears people are going to start top posting to make my life easier.
>>>Therefore, I am giving up and will start bottom posting. I would still
>>>prefer everyone top post so I wouldnt have to scroll in my preview pane,
>>>but I know you all arent perfect. ;)
>>
>>Thanks for proving that you are an absolute fuckhead.
>>
>>I bet your parents are really dissapointed.
>>
>>Dazz
>
>Lets be fair Dazz, the guy started and fueled the longest thread
>in a.c.s for some time that was vaguely on topic. The second
>trolling attempt at it with 'top posting' is not nearly as successful
>but he has you going.
True, but he makes himself such an easy target that I can't help
myself. :-)
Dazz
>HINT: Jim <me@mail.com> visit demon.local and post something with a
>signature of six lines and see what happens ...
- Next message: Dazz: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Previous message: Dazz: "Re: bottom posting"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: bottom posting"
- Next in thread: Jim: "Re: bottom posting"
- Reply: Jim: "Re: bottom posting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]