Re: sick of Linux bias
From: newcastle (dan_at_nospam.net)
Date: 01/09/04
- Previous message: newcastle: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Next in thread: Jim Richardson: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 15:01:12 -0800
Leythos wrote:
> In article <n72qc1-bbl.ln1@grendel.myth>, warlock@eskimo.com says...
>
>>And the RH list included updates for everything from AWK to zsh, for a
>>half dozen webservers, a couple of mail servers, multiple compilers,
>>games, office software, browsers, image viewers, video players, database
>>engines, etc.
>>
>>Compared to .... W2K with one tenth of the functionality.
>>
>>What's W2K come with? the OS, *one* mail reader? *one* browser?
>>
>>Perl? nope,
>>Python? nope,
>>
>>
>>if you're going to compare vulnerabilities announcments, compare like
>>with like.
>
>
> MS can't provide all of those - you would bitch about how they are
> trying to own the world if they did!
>
> Remember when people wanted MS to remove IE, just so you could bitch
> about it!
>
What does that have to do with the man's point?
d
- Previous message: newcastle: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Next in thread: Jim Richardson: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|