Re: sick of Linux bias

From: Hairy One Kenobi (abuse_at_[127.0.0.1)
Date: 01/06/04


Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:00:24 -0000


"John" <jwholmes@muskyscent.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.01.06.01.16.30.996105@muskyscent.net...
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 00:18:56 +0000, Leythos wrote:
> > In article <olrjvv0onk8m5ls7p1c8q8k7ece093rqs6@4ax.com>,
> > jimwatt@aol.no_way says...
> >> On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 17:22:50 -0500, Jim <me@mail.com> wrote:

<snip>

> Anyone who genuinly wants to save money should go Linux. You can buy
> 1 copy of say, SuSE 9 for $79 and install it 10 times for the desktops
plus
> one more for the server.

<Sigh> The same old claim, the same old error. Or does noone read license
agreements anymore?

http://www.suse.co.uk/uk/business/products/sld/license.html

> OpenOffice comes with it and can do 90% of what
> Office does which is about 50% more than most people use. I admit Linux is
> weaker in project management software. You may need wine (free and
> included) to run Project. Dia and other diagraming programs may be
> adequate but Visio is better so run that under wine also. That means you
> will total $877 for the whole thing. Oh and you can run it on your
> existing computers if they can handle Win98 or NT 4.0. No need for
> expensive hardware upgrades.

That's true, and one reason that SuSE in particular are apparently
flourishing in MS-hating Germany. (Or should I call them Novell..? SuSE, not
the Germans.. ;o)

The current distros have come forward in leaps and bounds - IIRC, RH5 & 6
were very finicky with NICs and graphics cards. This variable hardware
support is one of the major problems, IMHO - you don't have to be operating
/that/ many machines before you have to start exchanging your six days'
consultancy for hardware. As I've discovered to my cost, RH9 can't handle my
generic 15" LCD panel.

> There will be some training costs but not
> much. Linux can operate pretty much like Windows for office people if
> desired and OpenOffice is too close to need explaining for most people.

<Cough> You met any genuine business users recently?

> Oh yeah, you will also get the leading DNS software (BIND), leading web
> server (Apache), leading e-mail server (Sendmail), a good firewall
> (iptables) that will probably require hiring someone to setup but then all
> firewalls should be setup by someone who knows what they are doing. You
> also gain immunity from most (not all) viruses, increased reliability,
> better user support and flexibility should your needs change. Both SuSE
> and Microsoft are easy to update but SuSE needs it less frequently since
> it is less of a target and arguably more secure.

I'd argue about the better user support. I'd also argue against a Linux
newbie attempting to setup Sendmail without knowing what they're doing (or,
more accurately, deconfiguring it from a machine that doesn't need mail).
Thankfully, basic firewall config is now included as part of the
installation - something that Solaris has had for years. (Shock horror -
something on-topic for this froup ;o)

Glad to see that you've mentioned the update frequency, though - always a
major headache for a large organization, who tend to think in five-year
financial cycles. A techie's glee at frequent updates is a depressing cost
overhead for a CFO.

Talking of ongoing support costs.. I'm still trying to puzzle-out where all
of these cheap Linux experts are hiding - the evangelists always mention
them, but I never seem to find any. Cheap idiots claiming to know Windows
are, unfortunately, ten-a-penny - as one would expect with that sort of
market share.

> I used SuSE for the example but there are other distros that work as
> well. RedHat has recently ditched the home user/SMB market for the
> enterprise but you can buy/download RedHat 9 still.

True - I think that you'll find this happening more and more - particularly
as more business people see it as a valid competitor to MS. These companies
are around to make money, after all.

And finally, a declaration of non-interest: I don't give a toss what OS I'm
using, just so long as it's the best for the task in hand.

-- 
Hairy One Kenobi
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this opinion do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of the highly-opinionated person expressing the opinion
in the first place. So there!
P.S. Anyone want to step back 20 years and reopen the Unix vs. VMS argument?
;o)


Relevant Pages

  • Re: sick of Linux bias
    ... I admit Linux is ... and one reason that SuSE in particular are apparently ... I'd argue about the better user support. ... the opinions expressed in this opinion do not necessarily ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • [alt.os.linux.suse] FAQ
    ... alt-os-linux-suse FAQ and desired newsgroup behavior ... Keywords: faqs suse linux ... first-born, male child to the gurus of Linux, ad nauseum. ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • [alt.os.linux.suse] FAQ
    ... alt-os-linux-suse FAQ and desired newsgroup behavior ... Keywords: faqs suse linux ... first-born, male child to the gurus of Linux, ad nauseum. ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • [alt.os.linux.suse] FAQ
    ... alt-os-linux-suse FAQ and desired newsgroup behavior ... Keywords: faqs suse linux ... first-born, male child to the gurus of Linux, ad nauseum. ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • [alt.os.linux.suse] FAQ
    ... alt-os-linux-suse FAQ and desired newsgroup behavior ... Keywords: faqs suse linux ... first-born, male child to the gurus of Linux, ad nauseum. ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)