Re: sick of Linux bias
From: Jbob (nobody_at_SpamCox.net)
Date: 01/06/04
- Next message: Bit Twister: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Previous message: \: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- In reply to: Jim: "sick of Linux bias"
- Next in thread: Bit Twister: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Reply: Bit Twister: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Reply: Alexander Delarge: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:58:32 -0600
"Jim" <me@mail.com> wrote in message
news:PZkKb.8756$zr3.651@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
> Here is a little article for all of you linux boys out there who feel
> Linux has little to no security flaws. I am looking for the article now
> and will post later, but do any of you remember how the back door trjan
> almost made it into the kernel?
>
> Open Source and Secure just dont go hand in hand.
>
> http://news.com.com/2100-1002_3-5135129.html?tag=nefd_top
>
> Jim
I have one thought for all:
I you were gonna start a small computer consulting business to work for
yourself, which OS would be best support to make a living? DUH
- Next message: Bit Twister: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Previous message: \: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- In reply to: Jim: "sick of Linux bias"
- Next in thread: Bit Twister: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Reply: Bit Twister: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Reply: Alexander Delarge: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
