Re: Port scan attempts
From: Colonel Flagg (colonel_flagg_at_NOSOUPFORJ00internetwarzone.org)
Date: 12/22/03
- Previous message: sponge: "Re: HELP! - cable newbie under attack!"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Ravi: "Port scan attempts"
- Next in thread: Mimic: "Re: Port scan attempts"
- Reply: Mimic: "Re: Port scan attempts"
- Reply: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: Port scan attempts"
- Reply: Bit Twister: "Re: Port scan attempts"
- Reply: _at_micro$oft.com: "Re: Port scan attempts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:41:01 -0500
In article <tdeeuvspog49uonkgpi7id2cc8i2tcq3qs@4ax.com>,
ravi@despammed.com says...
> "Date: 22/12/2003 Time: 22:52:16 (GMT +5:30)
> Port scan detected from address 206.204.10.200.
> Blocked further access for 30 minutes after detecting at
> least 6 ports being probed."
>
> Is there a way I can report abouse for this?
>
> It appears that I must report abuse to:
> abuse@conxion.net
>
> but that address is invalid - I believe.
>
> So what can I do?
>
abuse?
it's not illegal to port scan. get over it.
# nslookup 206.204.10.200
Name: security.symantec.com
Address: 206.204.10.200
-- Colonel Flagg http://www.internetwarzone.org/ Privacy at a click: http://www.cotse.net Q: How many Bill Gates does it take to change a lightbulb? A: None, he just defines Darkness? as the new industry standard..." "...I see stupid people."
- Previous message: sponge: "Re: HELP! - cable newbie under attack!"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Ravi: "Port scan attempts"
- Next in thread: Mimic: "Re: Port scan attempts"
- Reply: Mimic: "Re: Port scan attempts"
- Reply: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: Port scan attempts"
- Reply: Bit Twister: "Re: Port scan attempts"
- Reply: _at_micro$oft.com: "Re: Port scan attempts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
