Re: Anonymizer Tunnel Server Problems

From: futureworlds (nobody_at_mail.futureworlds.it)
Date: 11/21/03 

Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 01:32:05 +0100 (CET)

nobody@dizum.com says...
> As I've already said, I don't really give a *** whether he gets
terminated
> or not.

For someone who doesn't care you certainly do a lot of whining about him.

> It's Cotse's blatant lies!

Ah yes, those blatant lies where their ToS said they don't term on third
party complaints of posting personal info and therefore would not term
for you. You then shout lies when they are sticking firm to their ToS.
 Seems only one person is lying here.

> A search through google groups says
> everything about them. I see the same small number of people defending
> Cotse while all around the abuse causes everyone else problems.

Which google are you looking at? I see the opposite, I see a few very
loud people complaining by flooding and such and a lot of people
defending. Cotse even seems to be well respected in the net-abuse
groups. Perhaps you ought to actually read those google results.

>
> To put it in perspective, there seems to be hardly the same signal to
noise
> ratio or abuse levels coming from Anonymizer's customers!
>

First, I don't see this abuse you seem to see, care to post any current
examples? I see no current or even recent (last two years are as far as
I went back digging, nothing there) abuse about Cotse. As far as people
like you complaining about a poster they don't like who's not abusive,
that's probably because usenet posts from anonymizer don't stamp
anonymizer.com all over them like Cotse does. Take something that does
stamp as an example, I see far more complaints about remailers than
Cotse. Hell, I see more complaints about nearly every NSP other than
Cotse.

> BlueBird is only hurting his own and Cotse's credibility with his actions!
> No-one elses.
>

Says only you, it seems. You and the flooder, one and the same most
likely. You, on the other hand, are really boosting Cotse's credibility.

Quantcast