Re: A Mailicious looking hack
From: Chuck (cacrollthespam_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/29/03
- Next message: Jim: "Re: A Mailicious looking hack"
- Previous message: Peter Eberz: "Re: sniffer black box"
- In reply to: David Postill: "Re: A Mailicious looking hack"
- Next in thread: Bottle: "Re: A Mailicious looking hack"
- Reply: Bottle: "Re: A Mailicious looking hack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 29 Oct 2003 13:37:04 -0600
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 17:56:18 GMT, David Postill <david@postill.org.uk>
wrote:
>Your best option at this point is a clean install from known good media
>(your original windows NT CD). While doing so make sure you are not connected
>to the internet.
>
>Before connecting to the internet install firewall and virus checkers also
>from known good media (a good idea might be to get someone who has a secure
>system to download them and burn them to CD for you, along with all updates,
>particularly for the virus checker).
Or get a NAT router, and install the updates on your computer safely
and quickly, while connected.
A NAT router, software firewall, and properly updated OS /
applications are all part of a layered defense. None of them is
unnecessary, and all are affordable.
Chuck
I hate spam - PLEASE get rid of the spam before emailing me!
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
- Next message: Jim: "Re: A Mailicious looking hack"
- Previous message: Peter Eberz: "Re: sniffer black box"
- In reply to: David Postill: "Re: A Mailicious looking hack"
- Next in thread: Bottle: "Re: A Mailicious looking hack"
- Reply: Bottle: "Re: A Mailicious looking hack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|