Re: HOSTS Spybot F-Secure BackWeb
From: Ron Reaugh (ron-reaugh_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 09/26/03
- Next message: Colonel Flagg: "Re: HOSTS Spybot F-Secure BackWeb"
- Previous message: Colonel Flagg: "Re: HOSTS Spybot F-Secure BackWeb"
- In reply to: Colonel Flagg: "Re: HOSTS Spybot F-Secure BackWeb"
- Next in thread: Colonel Flagg: "Re: HOSTS Spybot F-Secure BackWeb"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 03:00:07 GMT
"Colonel Flagg" <colonel_flagg@NOSOUPFORJ00internetwarzone.org> wrote in
message news:MPG.19dd71702dd712d9989b1e@news.charter.net...
> In article <9RMcb.153330$0v4.11425106@bgtnsc04-
> news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, ron-reaugh@worldnet.att.net says...
> > The presence of BackWeb in the F-Secure download and the fact that it
causes
> > SpyBot to hang an XP system is simply unconscionable and moves F-Secure
to
> > the dark side.
>
>
> You're a goddamn idiot.
>
> Backweb isn't bad, the people that MISUSE it *under certain
> circumstances* would be considered bad.
Clueless.
Try your nonsensical rantings on the folks at SpyBot who immediately strip
out(or at least try to) that which F-Secure Trialware installs aka BackWeb.
What is F-Secure doing installing something(BackWeb) that SpyBot has
identified as something to rip out? What is F-Secure doing installing
something(BackWeb) that is SpyBot resistant and results in system hangs?
That's the smokin gun here.
Blacklist F-Secure is the obvoius course for those with a clue.
- Next message: Colonel Flagg: "Re: HOSTS Spybot F-Secure BackWeb"
- Previous message: Colonel Flagg: "Re: HOSTS Spybot F-Secure BackWeb"
- In reply to: Colonel Flagg: "Re: HOSTS Spybot F-Secure BackWeb"
- Next in thread: Colonel Flagg: "Re: HOSTS Spybot F-Secure BackWeb"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
