Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting
From: David (davidwnh_at_adelphia.net)
Date: 09/20/03
- Next message: David: "Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting"
- Previous message: Colonel Flagg: "Re: Your Opinion - Best Site for Update IT Security News"
- In reply to: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting"
- Next in thread: David: "Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:31:27 GMT
But the difference is in the restrictions that MS has on what can be taken
out. Add to that the fact that you can't run services in jails like you can
with linux, and you realize it is much harder with windows to keep the
compromise of a single service from leading to much much more.
>
> Granted, the default installations of Windows2K and WindowsXP has a lot
> of junk running, but in all fairness, so does a default installation of
> RedHat (at least the 3 versions that I've worked on; 7, 8 and 9) ...
>
>
> Lars M. Hansen
> http://www.hansenonline.net
> (replace 'badnews' with 'news' in e-mail address)
- Next message: David: "Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting"
- Previous message: Colonel Flagg: "Re: Your Opinion - Best Site for Update IT Security News"
- In reply to: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting"
- Next in thread: David: "Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading