Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting
From: BC (bconneely_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/19/03
- Next message: ry_at_DundasValley: "Piece of mind to anyone who wishes to know if there are any installations happening behind your back"
- Previous message: Fred_McGriff: "Make OS Liable for Security"
- In reply to: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting"
- Next in thread: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 18 Sep 2003 17:44:56 -0700
Lars M. Hansen <badnews@hansenonline.net> wrote in message news:<hnejmv09hi0cas62mfv853v6sql472atoa@4ax.com>...
>
>
> Microsoft decided to temporarily relocate the windowsupdate site to
> somewhere that would not be impacted by a potential DDoS attack. You're
> reading why to much into that fact that the caching service was a Linux
> box.
>
> Windows, configured properly by someone who has a clue is just as secure
> as any Linux/Unix box.
>
>
> Lars M. Hansen
> www.hansenonline.net
Hmmm, if true, I guess that means nobody at Microsoft has a clue.
Which in turn would mean all the rumors are true.... ;)
-BC
- Next message: ry_at_DundasValley: "Piece of mind to anyone who wishes to know if there are any installations happening behind your back"
- Previous message: Fred_McGriff: "Make OS Liable for Security"
- In reply to: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting"
- Next in thread: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Which Router for VPN and Webhosting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]