Re: M$ attack on Common Sense
From: User (User_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/13/03
- Next message: Max Burke: "Re: M$ attack on Common Sense"
- Previous message: User: "Re: M$ attack on Common Sense"
- In reply to: Alan Connor: "Re: M$ attack on Common Sense"
- Next in thread: Ed Murphy: "Re: M$ attack on Common Sense"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 06:32:54 GMT
"Alan Connor" <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:RJb7b.4118$PE6.2994@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 03:13:50 GMT, Leythos <void@nowhere.com> wrote:
> linux is more stable and more efficient and more secure than Windoze.
>
> This could be proven in a court of law.
I have been asking for good solid evidence to be posted from Alan about this
for some time but he simply repeats this claim without any evidence.
Just because the US President told the world 1000 times that Iraq had and
were going to use nuclear weapons doesn't mean it was actually true. Just
because you say something 1000 times it doesn't mean it is true.
I want proof.
> Alan C
- Next message: Max Burke: "Re: M$ attack on Common Sense"
- Previous message: User: "Re: M$ attack on Common Sense"
- In reply to: Alan Connor: "Re: M$ attack on Common Sense"
- Next in thread: Ed Murphy: "Re: M$ attack on Common Sense"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|