Re: DDOS attack Microsoft
From: User (User_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/08/03
- Next message: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: DDOS attack Microsoft"
- Previous message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Hackers Secret Weapons - Virtual Private Networks"
- In reply to: Alan Connor: "Re: DDOS attack Microsoft"
- Next in thread: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: DDOS attack Microsoft"
- Reply: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: DDOS attack Microsoft"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 11:01:40 GMT
"Alan Connor" <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:dDU6b.3318$Yt.492@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 04:34:14 GMT, User <User@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On the other hand I cannot see anything in the basic security models to
> > suggest that linux [in general] is better than windows for security nor
is
> > there many more security / critical updates for windows than linux which
> > would suggest buggier code.
> >
> >
>
>
> Yes. I can well understand why YOU "...cannot see anything in the basic
> security model.....".
>
>
> Because you obviously know nothing about *nix.
>
>
> Any newbie could tell you that the 'security model' in *nix begins with
> the system of file ownerships and permissions.
I guess you have just demonstrated your ignorance of NTFS.
- Next message: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: DDOS attack Microsoft"
- Previous message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Hackers Secret Weapons - Virtual Private Networks"
- In reply to: Alan Connor: "Re: DDOS attack Microsoft"
- Next in thread: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: DDOS attack Microsoft"
- Reply: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: DDOS attack Microsoft"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
