Re: Hacker's Secret Weapons -- Holy Cow !
From: mto (nobody_at_dontsendmeanyspam.thanks)
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 09:41:55 -0400
"Lohkee" <Lohkee@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> <Colonel Kernel@sys32.com> wrote in message
<SNIP> On the other hand, a popular "signature" used within the group ("The
> the name "Tracker" aka "Debbie", VPNSISHACKERSSECRET, aka "snailmail"
> regularly posts incorrect, misleading and damaging information,
> to rely on the advice of this person could result in irreparable damage to
> your system.. . . "), in addition to many of the other statements about
> individual made within the postings themselves, could very easily be
> construed as libel.
In order to be considered libel a statement must be false. And the burden
of proof that the statement IS false is Tracker's. If she would wish to
claim libel, then she must demonstrate to the satisfaction of a court of law
that the statements she considers to be libelous are indeed incorrect.