Re: And another one just for fun!

From: Lohkee (Lohkee_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 08/26/03


Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:26:28 GMT


"Chris Croughton" <chris@keristor.org> wrote in message
news:slrnbkm912.ua.chris@ccserver.keris.net...
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:43:05 GMT, Lohkee
> <Lohkee@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >"donut" <none@none.com> wrote in message
> >news:Xns93E26B0A35Bdonut@216.102.43.227...
> >> "Lohkee" <Lohkee@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
> >> news:sQa2b.112440$3o3.7918597@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> >>
> >>
> >> >> 2. Use a properly configured firewall.
> >> >
> >> > Incapable of reliably stopping a well-written virus (not to mention
> >> > those originating from the inside).
> >>
> >> How is a properly configured firewall incapable of stopping a well
written
> >> virus? How does it get inside to begin with? There are always people
> >> claiming this, but I have yet to see it demonstrated.
> >
> >Ever heard of a floppy diskette, CD ROM, Thumb Drive, or a keyboard? Ever
> >heard of email attachments?
>
> All of which require the user to import them. If the user deliberately
> bypasses the firewall, of course it won't prevent things (duh!).

Exactly my point.

>
> >How about embedding code in the comments section
> >of a web-page?
>
> Huh? How would that do anything at all? Comments are ignored, or
> should be by any browser written by sopmeone competant.

Who said anything about the browser? We are talking about methods to
circumvent a firewall.

>
> >For that matter, consider any of the "major" viruses over the
> >past five years.
>
> Yes, all due to the users not having a firewall and/or opening things
> without bothering to check (see my comment about babies sticking things
> in their mouths).

Better do some research on hostile code before you make such statements
(although I do agree with your comment about babies).

>
> >> Why? If the firewall keeps it out, the only way it can get in is if the
> >> user allows it in somehow.
> >
> >History has shown that users are very good at doing just that, or do you
not
> >follow (as you suggested earlier) what is going on in the world (Melissa,
> >Love Bug, etc, etc, etc).
>
> Think of it as evolution in action. I have no sympathy with people who
> continually use broken software, knowing that it is broken, or who still
> open unknown attachments despite all the warnings. I only have sympathy
> for their victims, the ones who then get flooded with the amails etc.

Agreed!

>
> To misquote lady Bracknell: "To be infected with one virus may be
> regarded as a misfortune; to be infected with two looks like
> carelessness."
>
> >My obligation to trolls (and idiots) has now been met.
>
> So you are now leaving? Please close the door on your way out.

Such a shame, and to think that you were actually starting to show some
semblence of rational thought.

Lohkee!

>
> Chris C



Relevant Pages

  • Re: And another one just for fun!
    ... >>heard of email attachments? ... > bypasses the firewall, of course it won't prevent things. ... I have no sympathy with people who ... > continually use broken software, knowing that it is broken, or who still ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: And another one just for fun!
    ... bypasses the firewall, of course it won't prevent things. ... I have no sympathy with people who ... continually use broken software, knowing that it is broken, or who still ... "To be infected with one virus may be ...
    (alt.computer.security)
  • Re: And another one just for fun!
    ... bypasses the firewall, of course it won't prevent things. ... I have no sympathy with people who ... continually use broken software, knowing that it is broken, or who still ... "To be infected with one virus may be ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: pc security behind a switch/router question
    ... > effective hardware firewall. ... - Email attachments, past Outlook problems. ... something exploited when connecting to a compromised site. ... patches and use sensible rules with your email clients and web browsers. ...
    (alt.computer.security)
  • Re: Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation. [SMTP Error Code 552]
    ... sending large email attachments to an external domain. ... He is not exceeding outgoing SMTP size limits. ... Do the logs on the firewall offer anything of value? ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)

Quantcast