Re: Delphi and buffer overflows
- From: Gadi Evron <ge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 03:52:56 +0200
Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 12:46:06 GMT, Majid2k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
All Programs compiled in Delphi are secure
Explain. Do tell. How does a language manage to be Turing-complete and
at the same time provably secure? (Hint - Turing-complete includes the
possibility of a program infinite looping, so at the very least, there's
the possibility of a loop causing a DoS attack....)
Or did Delphi use some different definition of "secure"?
Valdis, I tend to like Delphi and agree with the guy, but you are 100% correct.
That is because [especially] in the world of security the following words should be banned: all, every, never, etc.
I bet that if you put a backdoor into a program written in Delphi it will no longer be 100% secure, right? That may be a bit of immature nitpicking, but really..
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delphi and buffer overflows
- From: André Gil
- Re: Delphi and buffer overflows
- References:
- Re: Delphi and buffer overflows
- From: Majid2k
- Re: Delphi and buffer overflows
- From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Delphi and buffer overflows
- Prev by Date: FW: Google Reader "preview" and "lens" script improper feed validation
- Next by Date: Re: Delphi and buffer overflows
- Previous by thread: Re: Delphi and buffer overflows
- Next by thread: Re: Delphi and buffer overflows
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|