Re: ndisasm bad opcodes interpretation
From: Dave Korn (davek_throwaway_at_hotmail.com)
To: email@example.com Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:42:17 -0000
"shadown" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> 0000001C 7565 jnz 0x83
> sould had been jnz 0x65
No it shouldn't. Engage brain before opening mouth: what is 0x65 + 0x1e
(== address of byte immediately after the instruction in question)? Google
"pc-relative branch displacement" for more. Or learn some assembler
programming before trying to use a disassembler.
-- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....