Re: Defeating non-executable stacks ... trying to, actually

emial_at_alumni.uv.es
Date: 09/03/03

  • Next message: Nick Cleaton: "Re: exim remote heap overflow, probably not exploitable" 
    Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:30:41 +0200 (CEST)
To: Marco Ivaldi <raptor@0xdeadbeef.info>

    Hi Marco,

    Thanks a lot for your code. After a bit of tunning (GCC 3.2.2 adds a 8
    bytes pad between vars and BP) it's working. Now it just rests to figure
    out why mine one didn't work ;)

    Best regards,
    Emilio Mira

    On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Marco Ivaldi wrote:

    > Hey Emilio,
    >
    > Find a working example attached, based on the second technique described
    > by Nergal in his "Defeating Solar Designer's Non-executable Stack Patch"
    > paper. Hope you'll find it useful :)
    >
    > Cheers,
    >
    > :raptor
    > 

    -- 
Emilio Mira
e-mail: emial@alumni.uv.es
------------------------------------------------------
"Sure UNIX is user friendly; it's just picky about who
its friends are."
------------------------------------------------------
  • Next message: Nick Cleaton: "Re: exim remote heap overflow, probably not exploitable"
    • Quantcast