RE: How vulnerable is a 'Limited" account on XP?

From: Brad Bemis (Brad.Bemis_at_airborne.com)
Date: 07/09/03

  • Next message: Vade 79: "UMN gopherd[2.x.x/3.x.x]: ftp gateway, and GSisText() buffer overflow exploits."
    Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:05:02 -0700
    To: "Bernie Cosell" <bernie@fantasyfarm.com>, VULN-DEV@securityfocus.com
    
    

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    More often than not the real issues is one of 'privilege escalation'
    attempts, or is your question more related to the 'user context'
    relationship between malicious code infections and access control
    limitations associated with a non-privileged account?

    - - Brad Bemis

    - -----Original Message-----
    From: Bernie Cosell [mailto:bernie@fantasyfarm.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:08 AM
    To: VULN-DEV@securityfocus.com
    Subject: How vulnerable is a 'Limited" account on XP?

    I've been wondering: are there exploits/vulnerabilities that can burrow
    into a system through a limited account on XP? I've tried playing around
    a little bit [but I'm really not very much of an XP-hacker] and it sure
    seems hard to get a toehold on the system from my limited account. With
    the entire system drive essentially read-only, and with its not being
    able to mess with ADMIN or SYSTEM processes, I wonder just how vulnerable
    XP is... [for example, I"ve been tempted (but too chicken) to try
    intentionally infecting myself with one or another of the email-borne
    viruses just to see how far they could penetrate into my system].

      /Bernie\

    - --
    Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
    mailto:bernie@fantasyfarm.com Pearisburg, VA
        --> Too many people, too few sheep <--

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Comment: KeyID: 0xB8F26ADD
    Comment: Fingerprint: 6E1C D617 CD65 A203 7FD5 4C68 90E7 39F4 B8F2 6ADD

    iQA/AwUBPwxLPpDnOfS48mrdEQL0DgCg1J7Qp4P24Udzg2yOkyjDyj+hG10An3Wn
    9QaLfC/7tAib6Jv6paQPd1lb
    =8DVO
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  • Next message: Vade 79: "UMN gopherd[2.x.x/3.x.x]: ftp gateway, and GSisText() buffer overflow exploits."
  • Quantcast