How vulnerable is a 'Limited" account on XP?
From: Bernie Cosell (bernie_at_fantasyfarm.com)
Date: 07/08/03
- Previous message: Stephen Samuel: "Re: Red Hat 9: free tickets"
- Next in thread: xenophi1e: "Re: How vulnerable is a 'Limited" account on XP?"
- Maybe reply: xenophi1e: "Re: How vulnerable is a 'Limited" account on XP?"
- Maybe reply: Brad Bemis: "RE: How vulnerable is a 'Limited" account on XP?"
- Maybe reply: ph1zzle: "Re: How vulnerable is a 'Limited" account on XP?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: VULN-DEV@securityfocus.com Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 13:08:05 -0400
I've been wondering: are there exploits/vulnerabilities that can burrow
into a system through a limited account on XP? I've tried playing around
a little bit [but I'm really not very much of an XP-hacker] and it sure
seems hard to get a toehold on the system from my limited account. With
the entire system drive essentially read-only, and with its not being
able to mess with ADMIN or SYSTEM processes, I wonder just how vulnerable
XP is... [for example, I"ve been tempted (but too chicken) to try
intentionally infecting myself with one or another of the email-borne
viruses just to see how far they could penetrate into my system].
/Bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:bernie@fantasyfarm.com Pearisburg, VA
--> Too many people, too few sheep <--
- Previous message: Stephen Samuel: "Re: Red Hat 9: free tickets"
- Next in thread: xenophi1e: "Re: How vulnerable is a 'Limited" account on XP?"
- Maybe reply: xenophi1e: "Re: How vulnerable is a 'Limited" account on XP?"
- Maybe reply: Brad Bemis: "RE: How vulnerable is a 'Limited" account on XP?"
- Maybe reply: ph1zzle: "Re: How vulnerable is a 'Limited" account on XP?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]