A different bash blues
From: admin@badger.sytes.net
Date: 02/15/03
- Previous message: Vladamir Shmirnov: "Re: glibc glob_filename() recurse call stack overflow (Re[2]: Bash Blues)"
- In reply to: TerraTrans Security: "Re: Bash Blues."
- Next in thread: Adam Gilmore: "RE: A different bash blues"
- Reply: Adam Gilmore: "RE: A different bash blues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:48:30 -0500 (EST) From: <admin@badger.sytes.net> To: <vuln-dev@securityfocus.com>
In relation to the Bash Blues thread, I have something that may be of
interest.
eval `perl -e 'print ":;" x 97500'`
This causes bash to crash too sig 11. I don't know if this means anything
or not, but who knows, it may be useful to someone else. The number 97500
is most likely a lot higher that it needs to be but I have noticed that
when I have tried this on different machines, it takes slightly different
amounts of :; to get it to crash.
- Next message: Roland Postle: "Re: glibc glob_filename() recurse call stack overflow (Re[2]: Bash Blues)"
- Previous message: Vladamir Shmirnov: "Re: glibc glob_filename() recurse call stack overflow (Re[2]: Bash Blues)"
- In reply to: TerraTrans Security: "Re: Bash Blues."
- Next in thread: Adam Gilmore: "RE: A different bash blues"
- Reply: Adam Gilmore: "RE: A different bash blues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]