Bash Blues.
From: uk2sec@oakey.no-ip.com
Date: 02/13/03
- Previous message: Paul Brereton: "Strange IE / Windows Behaviour"
- Next in thread: Andrew Walkingshaw: "Re: Bash Blues."
- Reply: Andrew Walkingshaw: "Re: Bash Blues."
- Reply: Roland Postle: "Re: Bash Blues."
- Reply: TerraTrans Security: "Re: Bash Blues."
- Reply: Adam Gilmore: "RE: Bash Blues."
- Reply: Peter Pentchev: "Re: Bash Blues."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:26:51 +0000 (GMT) From: uk2sec@oakey.no-ip.com To: vuln-dev@securityfocus.com
[ Moderator: Post Edited Accordingly ]
uk2sec /bin/bash Advisory
By sending a perl request on the GNU bash terminal we can cause a
Segmentation Fault.
Work done was based on:
GNU bash, version 2.05a.0(1)-release (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
(Redhat 7.3)
The basis for this advisory is theoretical - Although not a current
security risk, a technique yet to be developed may allow exploitation.
Background:
During some work, I noticed GNU bash could be crashed by sending a
malformed perl request to the terminal.
example: `perl -e 'print "*/*" x 3500'`
<bash crashes>
(exact amount is: `perl -e 'print "*/*" x 2338'`)
This crash overwrites the ecx register on X86 (linux RH 7.3) systems, and
r23 on HPUX (11.00).
X86: ecx: 0x2f2f2f2f 791621423
HPUX r23: 2f2f2f2f00001e6e
This overflow may allow us to execute arbitrary code with the uid of the
person who crashes the shell. Since bash is not suid, this isn't a big
problem unless a special exploitation method can be created.
To reproduce the seg fault, you must enclose the perl request with ` ` .
` perl -e.... etc.. ` CORRECT
perl -e.... etc.. DOESN'T WORK
We have looked at ways to generate an exploit for this, however so far
nothing 'obvious' has been found. We tried creating a deep directory
structure which would be followed by something like a /tmp directory
watcher, however we are unable to create a directory 3500 folders deep.
Perhaps something with sym-links could be used to do this, and the
directory structure could contain our executable asm code.? Not tested,
just thoughts.
Furthermore we found several ways decrese the performance of a linux
machine to almost a stand still, however that is not part of this
advisory and can be disabled using resource limits on the server. For
more information feel free to contact uk2sec@oakey.no-ip.com.
Thanks for your time,
uk2sec
c0wd0g.
c0w_d0g3@yahoo.co.uk
uk2sec@oakey.no-ip.com
Memebers:
c0w_d0g (c0w_d0g3|@|yahoo.co.uk), deadbeat (deadbeat|@|hush.com).
- Next message: Eyal Udassin: "New freeware tools available from WebCohort"
- Previous message: Paul Brereton: "Strange IE / Windows Behaviour"
- Next in thread: Andrew Walkingshaw: "Re: Bash Blues."
- Reply: Andrew Walkingshaw: "Re: Bash Blues."
- Reply: Roland Postle: "Re: Bash Blues."
- Reply: TerraTrans Security: "Re: Bash Blues."
- Reply: Adam Gilmore: "RE: Bash Blues."
- Reply: Peter Pentchev: "Re: Bash Blues."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|