Re: Fw: f-prot antivirus useless buffer overflow
From: Jonas the Netwanderer (jonas@pbmhr.com)
Date: 02/07/03
- Previous message: Ali Saifullah Khan: "Re: Windows reverse Shell #2"
- Maybe in reply to: Knud Erik Højgaard: "Fw: f-prot antivirus useless buffer overflow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Jonas the Netwanderer <jonas@pbmhr.com> To: vuln-dev@securityfocus.com Date: 07 Feb 2003 09:11:40 -0500
Also fails against 3.12d for linux.
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 09:01, Jonas the Netwanderer wrote:
> Fails against 3.12a for linux.
>
> On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 13:51, Knud Erik Højgaard wrote:
> > bugtraq-owner@securityfocus.com wrote:
> > >>>>>> -------------------- >>>>>
> > > Send this to vuln-dev and note the possibility of exploitation through
> > > configurations such as backup scripts, etc.
> > > <<<<< -------------------- <<<<<
> >
> > Silly backupscripts using arguments to the f-prot binary in a silly way
> > may be vulnerable.
> >
> > --
> > Knud Erik Højgaard
-- ----------------------------------------- Jesus Saves... Passes to Moses. Shoots... He SCORES!
- Next message: Jonas the Netwanderer: "Re: Fw: f-prot antivirus useless buffer overflow"
- Previous message: Ali Saifullah Khan: "Re: Windows reverse Shell #2"
- Maybe in reply to: Knud Erik Højgaard: "Fw: f-prot antivirus useless buffer overflow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
